Mẹo Which of the following is the best description of facilitated communication?
Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn Which of the following is the best description of facilitated communication? 2022
Lê Khánh Vy đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Which of the following is the best description of facilitated communication? được Update vào lúc : 2022-12-26 13:26:05 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Mẹo Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi đọc tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Mình lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.Facilitated communication (FC) is a form of augmentative communication in which a person with a communication impairment expresses themselves by pointing (e.g., pictures, letters, or objects) or typing (e.g., on a keyboard). Also called Facilitated Communication Training, this method involves a communication partner (facilitator) who may provide emotional, communication and physical supports to enable the person to point reliably to communicate (ICI Research Statement 2010).
Nội dung chính Show- Historical BackgroundBuying optionsReferences and ReadingsAuthor informationAuthors and AffiliationsCorresponding authorEditor informationEditors and AffiliationsRights and permissionsCopyright informationAbout this entryCite this entryWhich of the following is the best description of schemas?Which of the following is the best example of selfWhat is the definition of analytic thinking quizlet?Which of the following is the most accurate overview of automatic thinking research?
Historical Background
FC was initially developed in Australia by Rosemary Crossley, who began using physical support to help nonspeaking individuals communicate in the 1970s. In 1989, Douglas Biklen of Syracuse University visited the DEAL Center in Australia and observed individuals using FC. In 1990, Biklen published an account of his DEAL observations in the Harvard Educational Reviewarticle titled “Communication Unbound.” Subsequently, the use of FC expanded rapidly in the United States, and in...
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Singapore)- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_773Chapter length: 7 pagesInstant PDF downloadReadable on all devicesOwn it foreverExclusive offer for individuals onlyTax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBookEUR 1,711.99Price includes VAT (Singapore)
- ISBN: 978-1-4419-1698-3Instant PDF downloadReadable on all devicesOwn it foreverExclusive offer for individuals onlyTax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Learn about institutional subscriptions
References and Readings
(n.d.). Facilitated communication training standards Section I: Introduction. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/facilitated_communication_institute/About_the_FCI/training_standards.aspx
(n.d.). Facilitated communication training standards Section II: Fundamental principles and best practices. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/facilitated_communication_institute/About_the_FCI/training_standards.aspx
(n.d.). Facilitated communication training standards Section III: Framework for training and technical assistance. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/facilitated_communication_institute/About_the_FCI/training_standards.aspx
(n.d.). Facilitated communication training standards Section IV: Facilitator competencies. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/facilitated_communication_institute/About_the_FCI/training_standards.aspx
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1998). Auditory integration training and facilitated communication for autism. Pediatrics, 102, 431–433.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Bebko, J., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 26, 19–42.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Google Scholar
Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound. Tp New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Biklen, D. (n.d.). Facts about facilitated communication. Syracuse, NY: Facilitated Communication Institute. Retrieved December 18, 2010, from Institute on Communication and Inclusion’s website on ://soeweb.syr.edu/centers_institutes/institute_communication_inclusion/about_the_ici/Authorship.aspx
Blackstone, S. W. (1994) Augmentative Communication News, 7(4), 1–8
Google Scholar
Bomba, C., O’Donnell, L., Markowitz, C., & Holmes, D. (1996). Evaluating the impact of facilitated communication on the communicative competence of fourteen students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 43–58.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Broderick, A. A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2001). “Say just one word first”: The emergence of reliable speech in a student labeled with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 13–24.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Cabay, M. (1994). Brief report: A controlled evaluation of facilitated communication using open-ended and fill-in questions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 517–527.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Calculator, S., & Singer, K. (1992). Preliminary validation of facilitated communication. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, ix–xvi.
Google Scholar
Cardinal, D. N., Hanson, D., & Wakeham, J. (1996). Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 231–242.
PubMed Google Scholar
Crews, W., Sanders, E., Hensley, L., Johnson, Y., Bonaventura, S., & Rhodes, R. (1995). An evaluation of facilitated communication in a group of nonverbal individuals with mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 205–213.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Crossley, R. (1994). Facilitated communication training. Tp New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Crossley, R., & Chadwick, M. (2000). Facilitated Communication Outcomes ISAAC 2000. Retrieved December 18, 2010, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/institute_communication_inclusion/what_is_supported_typing/default.aspx
Dowden, P. A., & Marriner, N. A. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication treatment principles and strategies. Seminars in Speech and Language, 16(140–158).
Google Scholar
Emerson, A., Grayson, A., & Griffiths, A. (2001). Can’t or won’t? Evidence relating to authorship in facilitated communication. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 98–103.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Institute on Communication and Inclusion Research Statement 2010. Retrieved December 18, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/institute_communication_inclusion/Research/authorship_and_controversy.aspx
Janzen-Wilde, M., Duchan, J., & Higginbotham, D. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 658–676.
PubMed Google Scholar
Kasa, C. (2008). Best practice in communication support. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from Syracuse University’s website ://soe.syr.edu/centers_institutes/institute_communication_inclusion/about_the_ici/training_materials.aspx
Kasa-Hendrickson, C., & Broderick, A. (2009). Supported typing and authorship. Retrieved December 18, 2010, from Syracuse University’s website: ://soeweb.syr.edu/centers_institutes/institute_communication_inclusion/about_the_ici/Authorship.aspx
Montee, B., Miltenberger, R., & Wittrock, D. (1995). An experimental analysis of facilitated communication. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 28, 189–200.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Moore, S., Donovan, B., Hudson, A., Dykstra, J., & Lawrence, J. (1993). Brief report; Evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 531–539.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 287–313.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mostert, M. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy – Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18, 31–41.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Niemi, J., & Karna-Lin, E. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case. Mental Retardation, 40, 347–357.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Regal, R., Rooney, J., & Wandas, T. (1994). Facilitated communication: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 345–355.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Shane, H., & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in ‘facilitated communication’. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 48–54.
Google Scholar
Sheehan, C., & Matuozzi, R. (1996). Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through the disclosure of unknown information. Mental Retardation, 34, 94–107.
PubMed Google Scholar
Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of a large Italian xorpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(5), 373–385.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tuzzi, A., Cemin, M., & Castagna, M. (2004). “Moved deeply I am” Autistic language in texts produced with FC. Journees internationals d’Analyse statistique des Donnees Textuelleds, 7, 1–9.
Google Scholar
Weiss, M., Wagner, S., & Bauman, M. (1996). A validated case study of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 220–230.
PubMed Google Scholar
Zanobini, M., & Scopesi, A. (2001). La comunicazione facilitata in un bambino autistico. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 5, 395–421.
Google Scholar
Download references
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Augmentative Communication Consultant, Augmentative Communication Consultant, Center on Disability & Community Inclusion, 208 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
Maureen Nevers
Authors
Maureen NeversView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Maureen Nevers .
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Director, Child Study Center, Irving B. Harris Professor of Child Psychiatry, Pediatrics and Psychology Yale University School of Medicine, Chief, Child Psychiatry Children's Hospital Yale-New Haven Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, USA
Fred R. Volkmar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Tp New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nevers, M. (2013). Facilitated Communication. In: Volkmar, F.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, Tp New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_773
Which of the following is the best description of schemas?
A schema is a cognitive structure that serves as a framework for one's knowledge about people, places, objects, and events. Schemas help people organize their knowledge of the world and understand new information.Which of the following is the best example of self
One of the classic examples of a self-fulfilling prophecy comes from the Greek story of Oedipus. In the story, Oedipus's father Laius is warned that his son will eventually kill him. To avoid meeting this fate, he abandons his son and leaves him to die.What is the definition of analytic thinking quizlet?
Analytic Thinking Style. A type of thinking in which people focus on the properties of objects without considering their surrounding context; this type of thinking is common in Western cultures. Holistic Thinking Style.Which of the following is the most accurate overview of automatic thinking research?
Which of the following is the best summary of research on automatic thinking? Automatic thinking is vital to human survival, but it is not perfect and can produce mistaken judgments that have important consequences. Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung bài viết Which of the following is the best description of facilitated communication?
Post a Comment